Nice discussions on the table.
However, we have to remember that
1) Flat figures in exhibitions, compétitions ad show represent globally about 5 to 8% of the figures presented
2) Small sizes (30 mm, even 40 mm) flats are declining in volume since the XXth century, mosty handled (there are exceptions), by people getting older, not so much by Young painters
3) New painters of small flats do'nt paint any longer large series like in the past, but single pièces with more détails, reducing the volume, but also the profitability of such business = single moulds for 30mm size are too expensive, serie moulds don't sell as many flats in the serie are satying behind in stock. Therefore traditonal series are less and les profitable.
4) Newer and younger painters are more attracted by larger size flats (54 to 120mm), busts, and non historic or soldiers themes and subjects. These are flats figures anyway.
5) It is true that today single 30 mm flats ar less chance of being awarded as they have less visibility than the larger ones, but creating a separate class will emphasize their decline. The same if we separate busts apart, historical subjects, fantasy, fantastic, .... in many subclasses ... when then on a 40 to 70 maximum pièces presented in a competition in Europe (agasint the 500 to 1200 round figures!!), will no longer be attractive and at most would leave one award by CLASS due to their multiplication ..
I see more the 30 mm flat business declining to the benefit of newer sizes and themes. Of course it causes nostalgy for older painters, but the same occurs with round figures where also fantastic themes, animals, busts are growing towards historical 54 and 75 mm sizes, contributing to maintain this business and art alive !!!
We see the same decline for large or medium dioramas towards single figures or sanyetes of 2 or 3 characters. Rejecting these new mode will accelerate the killing of the business.
We see the same rejection behaviour of the few painting of subjects on flat, non engraved surface duriung the last few years (like painting works of A. Retuerto, C. Cesario, a bit of Y. Durand on mangas, JP Duthilleul on a few). These are not flat figures defined as engraved surfaces in two dimensions to be painted as three dimensions by the art of painting. I had also the same rejection assimilating those as "miniatures", paintings like old painters on canvas, wood, ...
But this is a new kind ( or résurrection of an old) of painting requiring also the talent of drawing himself the subject, so in some sense more skills than painting a pre-engraved subject. Their volume is much too low to create a separate class (only 1 to 3 per show), but it should also not be rejected, but rather encourage until a separate group can be open and more artists be participating to this world of "figurines". Indeed subjects are similar, and no other show exists to have them growing.
We are not here to kill forms of art, but to promote them, grow, diversify. Noverlty is always causing rejection by traditionnalists, but attraction by modernists. The firts will resist, the other push, ... Where is progress then ?? Should be stay with cavern painting, or egyptian bas-relief as unique way of painting ?? Use post and handwritten letters are only method of communication?
We are free to select the one that fits us the best and convince in show or competition that we continue to please, to be the best in our art, hoping this form will continue to be popular and competitive ....